top of page
Search

Building Trust in Technology: Lessons from Explainable AI and Software Testing

  • Writer: Seema K Nair
    Seema K Nair
  • May 7, 2024
  • 3 min read

Updated: Mar 11


The more we understand how systems work, the more we recognise patterns across disciplines. While Explainable AI (XAI) and Software Testing belong to different domains, in a conceptual cross-application, they seem to share a conceptual goal: making technology transparent, reliable, and continuously improving.

By drawing these parallels, we can appreciate the strengths of each approach and selectively adopt best practices where they fit. Whether ensuring AI models make explainable decisions or verifying that software behaves as expected, both fields emphasise trust, accountability, and iteration in technology.

This article explores structural overlaps between Explainable AI and Software Testing—not as a direct comparison but as conceptual similarities in how both disciplines contribute to building robust, understandable, and reliable technology.


1. Transparency: Understanding the Inner Workings

XAI enhances transparency by breaking down how AI models make decisions—providing explanations that users and developers can understand. Since many machine learning models function as black boxes, explainability techniques clarify AI reasoning, reducing uncertainty in automated decision-making.

Similarly, software testing improves transparency in system behaviour by validating expected outcomes, identifying defects, and ensuring predictable application performance. Through real-world scenario simulations and debugging, testing makes software functionality measurable and traceable.

While distinct in scope, both XAI and Software Testing help users and developers trust the technology they rely on by making complex systems more understandable and predictable. 2. Feedback Loops: The Power of Iteration

Explainability in AI goes beyond understanding models—it supports continuous refinement. XAI generates feedback that improves model fairness, accuracy, and interpretability, making AI systems more adaptable and aligned with ethical considerations.

Likewise, software testing strengthens application performance by detecting defects, performance issues, and unexpected behaviours. Continuous testing methodologies, such as Agile and DevOps, integrate testing into development cycles, ensuring that each iteration enhances stability and reliability. Iteration is a great practice! Structured feedback ensures long-term effectiveness and trust in technology. 3. Reliability and Trust: Making Technology Dependable

A system that users can’t rely on is a system they won’t use. Whether AI or software, dependability is key.

XAI builds trust by explaining how AI models make decisions, reducing uncertainty, and helping users understand the reasoning behind an AI’s choices. However, explainability does not equate to accuracy. An AI model can provide a clear rationale for its decisions while still producing errors due to biased data or flawed training. 

Software testing, on the other hand, validates that a system meets predefined conditions and functions as expected. The point to note is that testing is only as effective as the functional requirements and test cases it follows— (that’s precisely why you need a professional QA team!) 

While XAI clarifies why a system made a decision, software testing confirms that a system performs as intended, reinforcing stability and dependability.

Both play distinct but complementary roles in making technology more reliable. 4. Continuous Improvement: Adapting to Change

Systems evolve to solve new requirements, data inputs, and user expectations.

XAI supports AI model improvement by analysing decision patterns, refining logic, and clarifying reasoning based on real-world feedback. It makes its reasoning more transparent and adaptable over time. (Note that explainability alone does not guarantee better outcomes.)

Software testing ensures stability during system evolution by validating whether updates function as expected and detecting potential issues before they affect performance. 

“Continuous improvement” is the core philosophy, contributing to making technology more adaptable, reliable, and aligned with user needs. 5. Accountability: Ensuring Responsible Development

As AI and software systems become integral to critical industries such as healthcare, finance, and security, accountability is essential.

XAI supports responsible AI development by making decisions clear, auditable, and aligned with ethical and regulatory standards.

Software testing upholds accountability by verifying security, compliance, and usability, ensuring that systems meet functional and legal requirements before deployment.

The idea is trustworthy technology that operates transparently and reliably within its intended purpose. Final thoughts

The conversation around trust, transparency, and reliability is not confined to a single discipline. The principles that guide Explainable AI and Software Testing are not just technical safeguards but philosophical commitments to making systems more accountable, adaptable, and user-centric.

But here’s the bigger question: Should we rethink how we define technological trust altogether?

If an AI model is explainable but still flawed, can we fully trust it? If the software passes all tests but fails to meet real-world expectations, is it truly reliable? Perhaps the future of trust in technology lies not in justifying past decisions or validating predefined conditions but in designing systems that evolve responsibly, self-correct, and remain aligned with human values.

 
 
 
bottom of page